[Python-3000] Change to class construction? (original) (raw)
Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sun Jul 8 19:50:30 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Change to class construction?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Change to class construction?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 11:55 AM 7/8/2007 +0300, Collin Winter wrote:
On 7/7/07, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
Collin, where did you find this code in setuptools, btw? I've been looking around at other packages of mine where static class initialization uses data structures like this, and I haven't found any place where anything but the "in" clause of a comprehension depends on class-scope variables. So, if setuptools is the only one of my libraries that does this, I'd have to agree with Guido that it is indeed quite rare. :)
If I had to hazard a guess, I'd guess that it's in one of the setuptools command classes that subclasses a distutils command, and proceeds to muck around with the original options in some fashion. I just don't want to check all of them if you know which one it is. :) Yep, it's in setuptools.command.install, lines 20-23 (setuptools v0.6c6).
Ah. Yeah, no big deal to change it; 'new_commands' and '_nc' don't need to be attributes of the class, and so could just be done before the 'class:' statement. I don't know why I even bothered with the _nc thing there, either.
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Change to class construction?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Change to class construction?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]