[Python-3000] Non-blocking I/O? (Draft PEP for New IO system) (original) (raw)
Daniel Stutzbach daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com
Wed Mar 7 17:32:21 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Non-blocking I/O? (Draft PEP for New IO system)
- Next message: [Python-3000] Non-blocking I/O? (Draft PEP for New IO system)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/7/07, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote:
> The buffering layer could then raise IOError (or perhaps a special > subclass of it) if the raw I/O layer ever returned one of these;
Is this a "could", or "should"? I would expect the buffering layer (particularly output) to use its buffer, and to appear blocking (through sleep-and-retry) when that isn't enough.
If programmer has wrapped a non-blocking object with a buffer to give it blocking behavior, I think this is a programming error and Python should treat as such, not work around it so that the problem is harder to detect.
An object only becomes non-blocking if the program explicitly makes it non-blocking via fcntl.
-- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises LLC
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Non-blocking I/O? (Draft PEP for New IO system)
- Next message: [Python-3000] Non-blocking I/O? (Draft PEP for New IO system)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]