[Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs (original) (raw)
Talin talin at acm.org
Thu Mar 8 03:39:35 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module
- Next message: [Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Going back in this list, I see a number of issues which were discussed at length, but there is no corresponding PEP. I realize that in some cases, this is because no actual consensus was reached.
In any case, I would like to know, what is the current status of the following issues:
-- Generic Functions -- Interfaces -- Metaclass syntax
It's not my intention to start a big thread about these - anyone who wants to can go back and read the old discussions. I mainly would like to know:
- Was there a final pronouncement, or at least a rough consensus on either of these? If so, what was it?
- Should these have PEPs? (Even if solely for purposes of rejection?)
- If they are not ready for PEPs, should the discussions be restarted on Python-ideas?
In order to prevent a major thread, I would suggest that any response that is not a direct answer to one of the above questions should be moved to python-ideas. Specifically, I'd like to avoid any discussion of the merits of the ideas themselves, or alternative solutions - let's limit the comments to just talking about their status.
And if you need someone to write those PEPs, I can do it - but I'll need some help on the first two in order to understand all of the sides of the controversy. The third one is pretty easy.
-- Talin
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module
- Next message: [Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]