[Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Mar 12 19:14:24 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
- Next message: [Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Mar 11, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Benji York wrote:
Greg Ewing wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
We already have an established, community accepted implementation of interfaces, Really? Which one is that? I believe Barry was referring to zope.interface.
Correct. AFAIK, there is only one other competing, mature package
(but please correct me if I'm wrong!): PyProtocols. My impression is
that the latter is essentially a superset of the former and that the
latter is compatible with the former.
The question then becomes whether we really want to invent a third
way of doing interfaces in Python, or whether our time is better
spent selecting and promoting one of the existing, tried-and-true
packages. Perhaps it would be better for us to figure out how and if
the two packages can be integrated. If a third way is still
advocated, then I think it must have a fairly high barrier to
acceptance in order to push aside such long accepted libraries.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBRfWYhnEjvBPtnXfVAQLIYgP/WbVv1ezQriZ+Vcbens8vl25q8RwCudik aTcJCDEPXCykhYDbj9KQIaNQd/+HBRgoBmUwEbQgCUI18zUBCNjanvODCcI9Kb/s Ad9w1gsTT1gqTPA2yLggfpYCS7mGttSLPvZJvXw9Vc60wjfpVtgCJphZG6WXza/i IrLpOYcOklc= =FNNm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
- Next message: [Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]