[Python-3000] Updated PEP: Integer literal syntax and radices (was octal/binary discussion) (original) (raw)
Patrick Maupin pmaupin at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 06:23:27 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Updated PEP: Integer literal syntax and radices (wasoctal/binary discussion)
- Next message: [Python-3000] Draft PEP for Requiring Lowercase Literal Modifiers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/19/07, Patrick Maupin <pmaupin at gmail.com> wrote:
(new version of the PEP)
D'oh. I just realized that the text I used in the title which Thomas pointed out was confusing is similarly scattered throughout the PEP. I will fix this on the next rev., and just refer to "integer literals", as it has been agreed that the "string" and "representation" parts are redundant and confusing.
Thanks, Pat
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Updated PEP: Integer literal syntax and radices (wasoctal/binary discussion)
- Next message: [Python-3000] Draft PEP for Requiring Lowercase Literal Modifiers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]