[Python-3000] Total ordering and cmp (original) (raw)
Collin Winter collinw at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 21:43:15 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Total ordering and __cmp__
- Next message: [Python-3000] Total ordering and __cmp__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/21/07, Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> wrote:
On 3/21/07, Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/20/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > [snip] > > Or we could just have 2.6 warn about the presence (or use) of cmp > > -- users can write equivalent code using lt etc. themselves and > > probably do a better job. > > Fair enough. > > Is anyone collecting a list of these --py3k warnings? There seem to be > a lot recent changes that 2.6's py3k-compat mode will be handling, but > I haven't seen anything about someone tracking them/working on a PEP > on the issue. Or did I just volunteer myself for that? : )
Neal and I have been updating PEP361, and I will be keeping an eye on it when I refactor the p3yk branch into separate py3k-feature-branches (be it bazaar or mercurial or whatever.) Each conceptual change in py3k will be a separate branch, so keeping track of what needs to be warned will be easier. (But the practical consequences of this will be clearer after I give it some concrete form :)
Good to know. Thanks, Thomas!
Collin Winter
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Total ordering and __cmp__
- Next message: [Python-3000] Total ordering and __cmp__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]