[Python-3000] [Python-3000-checkins] r54510 - in python/branches/p3yk/Lib: ConfigParser.py test/test_file.py (original) (raw)

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Thu Mar 22 00:28:46 CET 2007

On 3/21/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

PDFL? Petty Dictator For Life? Poodle Dictator For Life? Perhaps Dictator For Life? :-)

=) Hey, I'm sick so I get to have a typo or four.

I suggest that you update the PEP and then repost the pep on python-dev with a summary of the changes (to the PEP). I expect it to go smoothly.

Will do.

-Brett

--Guido

On 3/21/07, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > On 3/21/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > On 3/21/07, Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 3/21/07, brett.cannon <python-3000-checkins at python.org> wrote: > > > > When removing indexing/slicing on exceptions some places were changed > > > > inappropriately from e[0] to e.message instead of e.args[0]. The > > > > reason it needs to be the last option is the dichotomy of 'message' and 'args': > > > > 'message' can be the empty string but args[0] can have a value if more than one > > > > argument was passed. > > > > > > So e.args is going to stick around in 3.0? > > > > I think so. > > I just posted on my blog about this. I am curious to see what the > general public think, but I suspect it will stay as well. I was > cranky at the sprint because of my 'args' removal. Don't need to make > more people cranky. > > > e.message OTOH I think we can kill (perhaps deprecate it > > in 2.6; it was added in 2.5, this may be a record :-). > > Should we just consider this a PDFL pronouncement, or should we more > formally run this past python-dev? > > -Brett >

-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

More information about the Python-3000 mailing list