[Python-3000] bool in 2.6? (original) (raw)
Fred Drake fdrake at acm.org
Mon Oct 29 19:44:55 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] __bool__ in 2.6?
- Next message: [Python-3000] __bool__ in 2.6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:40 PM, James Thiele wrote:
So just to clarify: 2.6 nonzero first, then bool (if patch submitted) 3.x bool first, then nonzero
I'd expect switching the order for this to be a bug magnet. I'd much
rather see:
2.5 nonzero only 2.6 bool first, then nonzero (if patch submitted) 3.x bool first, then nonzero
The fewer variations there are in the algorithm, the better.
-Fred
-- Fred Drake
- Previous message: [Python-3000] __bool__ in 2.6?
- Next message: [Python-3000] __bool__ in 2.6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]