[Python-3000] http package: _FooCookieJar modules? (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon May 26 21:08:55 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-3000] http package: _FooCookieJar modules?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Why is type_modified() in typeobject.c not a public function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
Brett Cannon schrieb:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
dbm and xmlrpc are done, now I'm at the http package, and have a question: Is there any reason to keep the MozillaCookieJar and LWPCookieJar modules separate from http.cookiejar? I'd rather merge them into http.cookiejar and have two less strangely named modules.
They have leading underscores, so do what you will. If anyone directly imports them that's their problem. Done.
Great!
Wow, PEP 3108 might actually get finished before the beta!
-Brett
- Previous message: [Python-3000] http package: _FooCookieJar modules?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Why is type_modified() in typeobject.c not a public function?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]