[Python-3000] PEP: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item) (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com
Thu May 29 23:04:43 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-3000] PEP: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)
- Next message: [Python-3000] PEP 3140: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)s
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Oleg Broytmann <phd at phd.pp.ru> wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:31:17PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Let me just save everyone a lot of time and say that I'm opposed to this change, and that I believe that it would cause way too much disturbance to be accepted this close to beta.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Oleg Broytmann <phd at phd.pp.ru> wrote: > PEP: XXX > Title: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item) That's ok. A rejected PEP has its purpose, too. It will rest peacefully in the archive, holding all arguments consolidated and will serve as a point of reference. Any objection if I demand it be properly registered, assigned a number and then rejected?
I've added it for you. See r63794.
PS. Am I the champion whose PEP has been killed before I even finished it? ;)
Probably not. :)
Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd at phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000 at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/musiccomposition%40gmail.com
-- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
- Previous message: [Python-3000] PEP: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)
- Next message: [Python-3000] PEP 3140: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)s
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]