[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-476858 ] Assignment to () should be legal (original) (raw)
noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:37:19 -0800
- Previous message: [Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-476858 ] Assignment to () should be legal
- Next message: [Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-476557 ] Wrong error message for file.write(a, b)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bugs item #476858, was opened at 2001-10-31 10:07 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=476858&group_id=5470
Category: Parser/Compiler Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Assignment to () should be legal
Initial Comment:
From c.l.py:
Currently,
() = xgives a compile-time error.
This should really be allowed (and require that x is an empty sequence, of course) as an end case of
(a,b,c) = x # x must be a 3-sequence
(a,b) = x # x must be a 2-sequence
(a,) = x # x must be a 1-sequence
() = x # why can't x be z 0-sequence?Comment By: Tim Peters (timone) Date: 2001-10-31 10:37
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435
-1. "Assignment statements are used to (re)bind names to values and to modify attributes or items of mutable objects" (from the Ref Man). Since the degenerate cases (don't forget "[] = x" too) don't do that, they're not "assignment statements" in a meanignful sense; they would just be a surprising way to spell
if tuple(x): raise ValueError
That isn't a frequent enough need to deserve special syntax.
You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=476858&group_id=5470
- Previous message: [Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-476858 ] Assignment to () should be legal
- Next message: [Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-476557 ] Wrong error message for file.write(a, b)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]