[Python-checkins] r54796 - sandbox/trunk/pep0/TODO (original) (raw)

brett.cannon python-checkins at python.org
Fri Apr 13 00:08:54 CEST 2007


Author: brett.cannon Date: Fri Apr 13 00:08:50 2007 New Revision: 54796

Modified: sandbox/trunk/pep0/TODO Log: Clean up todo list. Separate out from discrepencies things that are from how the index has been handled and are definitely not the script's fault.

Modified: sandbox/trunk/pep0/TODO

--- sandbox/trunk/pep0/TODO (original) +++ sandbox/trunk/pep0/TODO Fri Apr 13 00:08:50 2007 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

Compatibility with PEP numerical index only (no static text). -* Type/status issues: +* Type/status issues (might be inconsistencies between index and PEP): - 160: missing F - 206: missing W - 216: missing R @@ -26,24 +26,12 @@ - 3107: used A, expected F - 3104: used A -* Titles are too long (use ellipsis?): - - 311 - - 3001

-* Blank lines between spaces in count: - - 42/100 - - 160/200 - - Will be more than currently in index: - + 364/666 - + 666/754 - + 754/3000 - + 3002/3099

Functionality to add

@@ -55,20 +43,49 @@ maintained and considered up-to-date? + Store Key in data structure for easy mapping? - Would allow for easy validation that metadata is correct in PEPs. + * Output PEP 0 with numerical PEP index. + * Output PEP 0 with special sections. + * Make sure that it is easy to identify which PEP triggered an error. + + Has all expected fields. + + Values in fields correct. + + Formatting correct. + - Plaintext. + - reST. -To clean up PEPs +Inconsistencies

-* Define (and enforce) consistency in Author field. +* Author field

-* Fix inconsistent usage of Status field.

-* Informational, meta, and process PEPs inconsistently have status listed in



More information about the Python-checkins mailing list