[Python-Dev] Allowing multiple socket maps in asyncore (and asynchat) (original) (raw)
Sam Rushing rushing@nightmare.com
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:52:22 -0800 (PST)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Allowing multiple socket maps in asyncore (and asynchat)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Boolean type for Py3K?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Fulton writes:
I find asyncore to be quite useful, however, it is currently geared to having a single main loop. It uses a global socket map that all asyncore dispatchers register with.
I have an application in which I want to have multiple socket maps.
But still only a single event loop, yes? Why do you need multiple maps? For a priority system of some kind?
I propose that we start moving toward a model in which selection of a socket map and control of the asyncore loop is a bit more explicit.
If no one objects, I'll work up some initial patches.
If it can be done in a backward-compatible fashion, that sounds fine; but it sounds tricky. Even the simple {:object...} change broke so many things that we're still using the old stuff at eGroups.
Who should I submit these to? Sam? Should the medusa public CVS form the basis?
Yup, yup.
-Sam
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Allowing multiple socket maps in asyncore (and asynchat)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Boolean type for Py3K?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]