[Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets (original) (raw)
Jeremy Hylton jeremy@cnri.reston.va.us
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:28:28 -0500 (EST)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets
- Next message: [Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"GVW" == gvwilson <gvwilson@nevex.com> writes:
GVW> On a semi-related note, can someone explain why programs are GVW> not allowed to iterate directly through the elements of a GVW> dictionary:
GVW> for (key, value) in dict: ...body...
Pythonic design rules #2: Explicit is better than implicit.
There are at least three "natural" ways to interpret "for ... in dict:" In addition to the version that strikes you as most natural, some people also imagine that a for loop should iterate over the keys or the values. Instead of guessing, Python provides explicit methods for each possibility: items, keys, values.
Yet another possibility, implemented in early versions of JPython and later removed, was to treat a dictionary exactly like a list: Call getitem(0), then 1, ..., until a KeyError was raised. In other words, a dictionary could behave like a list provided that it had integer keys.
Jeremy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets
- Next message: [Python-Dev] re: Using lists as sets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]