[Python-Dev] '*' instead of 'yield'? (original) (raw)
Ken Manheimer klm@zope.com
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 18:04:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] '*' instead of 'yield'?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] '*' instead of 'yield'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roman, that was a sensible way to end this particular thread - forgive me for gratuitously extending it a tiny bit, but i just can't resist...
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Roman Suzi wrote:
[...] Or, yes, and next step is to use '?' in place of 'print' ;-)
from future import parrot # must allow for such things: = myfun(x, y, z): ? "how are you?" S = 0 4 i <- x..y,z: S += i ** S = mygen(x): 4 k <- 1..x: * k ? myfun(1, 3, 5) ? mygen(20)
I don't feel this is an, um, balanced example if you leave alone the only non-expression in python that is signalled soley by punctuation, so:
from future import parrot
comment must allow for such things: endcomment
= myfun(x, y, z): ? "how are you?" S = 0 4 i <- x..y,z: S += i ** S ...
:)
and-voluntary-block-delimeter-close-would-be-"comment end endcomment"'ly y'rs,
Ken Manheimer klm@digicool.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] '*' instead of 'yield'?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] '*' instead of 'yield'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]