[Python-Dev] Any objections to adding threading.Timer? (original) (raw)
Aahz Maruch aahz@rahul.net
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 09:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Any objections to adding threading.Timer?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Any objections to adding threading.Timer?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin v. Loewis wrote:
In patch https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=428326&groupid=5470&atid=305470 a new threading.Timer class is proposed. Since the patch was submitted two months ago, nobody seemed to care enough to comment on it. I like it, and I'll commit the patch unless I hear otherwise.
I'm not objecting, precisely, but I have an allergic reaction to the way timed Event() works, even though there's really no other way to work it. I think that encouraging people to use it is a Bad Idea.
--- Aahz (@pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/ Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
I don't really mind a person having the last whine, but I do mind someone else having the last self-righteous whine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Any objections to adding threading.Timer?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Any objections to adding threading.Timer?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]