[Python-Dev] Classes and Metaclasses in Smalltalk (original) (raw)
Donald Beaudry Donald Beaudry donb@abinitio.com
Wed, 02 May 2001 11:31:45 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes and Metaclasses in Smalltalk
- Next message: IDEA for super (Re: [Python-Dev] Classes and Metaclasses in Smalltalk)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido@digicool.com> wrote,
AFAIK, Smalltalk has only single inheritance, and so does Java, so there 'super' is enough. Will we need to add a "::" operator to Python???
Multiple inheritance introduces a potential wrinkle in my definition of the unbound instance. The problem is that search starts one level too high. That is in:
class foo(b1, b2):
def __repr__(self):
super = b1._ #this one
super = b2._ #or this one?
return super.__repr__(self)
we dont know which base class to choose as the starting point for the search. This problem already exist. Now, if we want to avoid it, this:
class foo(b1, b2):
def __repr__(self):
super = foo.__super__
return super.__repr__(self)
comes to mind.
-- Donald Beaudry Ab Initio Software Corp. 201 Spring Street donb@init.com Lexington, MA 02421 ...Will hack for sushi...
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes and Metaclasses in Smalltalk
- Next message: IDEA for super (Re: [Python-Dev] Classes and Metaclasses in Smalltalk)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]