[Python-Dev] unifying os.rename semantics across platform (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido@digicool.com
Tue, 22 May 2001 19:46:53 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] unifying os.rename semantics across platform
- Next message: [Python-Dev] unifying os.rename semantics across platform
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It was brought to my attention a week ago by a client that os.rename semantics differ between Unix and Windows. On Unix, if the destination file already exists it is silently deleted. On Windows, an exception is raised. I was able to verify this for Python 2.0 on Windows98. I assume nothing changed for 2.1, but I can't verify that.
I've always known this, and assumed it was common knowledge. Sorry. ;-)
(Windows trashed my partition table and my Linux root partition while I was downloading 2.1. Consequently, I no longer run Windows. Take that, Bill...) I haven't checked the Mac yet (will do that when I get back to the US), but I think that os.rename should have the same semantics across all platforms. To the extent reasonably possible, I think this should also be true of other common functions exposed through the os module.
On the (unsupportable) theory that to-date, more Python apps have been written and/or deployed on Unix-like systems and that where Windows apps are concerned, many developers will have added a thin wrapper to mimic the Unix semantics, I think less breakage would result if the Unix semantics were implemented in the Windows version. It appears that is what POSIX compliance would demand as well. Skip
I certainly wouldn't want to try to emulate the Windows semantics on Unix. However, I think that emulating the correct Posix semantics on Windows is not possible either. The Posix rename() call guarantees that it is atomic: there is no point in time where the file doesn't exist at all (and a system or program crash can't delete the file). I wouldn't know how to do that in Windows -- the straightforward version
if os.path.exists(target):
os.unlink(target)
os.rename(source, target)
leaves a vulnerability open where the target doesn't exist and if at that point the system crashes or the program is killed, you lose the target.
I would prefer to document the difference so applications can decide how to deal with this.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] unifying os.rename semantics across platform
- Next message: [Python-Dev] unifying os.rename semantics across platform
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]