[Python-Dev] Performance of various marshallers (original) (raw)
Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake@acm.org
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:42:38 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Performance of various marshallers
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Performance of various marshallers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Skip Montanaro writes:
total test time (approximately 5 seconds). Each test was run 3 times. The largest number is recorded below, rounded to three significant digits.
encode decode ------ ------ marshal 25900 7830 cPickle 1230 149
Were the cPickle tests run in binary or original flavor?
xmlrpclib 0.9.8 w/ sgmlop 416 107 w/o sgmlop 415 16.3 <--+ xmlrpclib 1.0b4 | w/ sgmlop 365 92.0 | w/o sgmlop 363 74.9 <--+ py-xmlrpc 2780 2260 | |
+---------------------------------------------------+ | +----> I presume that Expat was available for the second run and not for the first? These should probably be broken into three categories: sgmlop, expat, and xmllib.
I also presume that py-xmlrpc never calls from C->Python
during the parse phase, but I've not yet had a chance to look
at this code.
-Fred
-- Fred L. Drake, Jr. PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Performance of various marshallers
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Performance of various marshallers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]