[Python-Dev] [UPDATE] PEP 274, Dict Comprehensions (original) (raw)
Barry A. Warsaw barry@zope.com
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:22:58 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [UPDATE] PEP 274, Dict Comprehensions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Dict API refinements (was PEP 274)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"TP" == Tim Peters <tim.one@home.com> writes:
TP> BTW, and not meaning to hijack your PEP <wink>, should
TP> dict.update() accept such an argument too? I didn't add it
TP> because
TP> d.update(dictionary(such_an_argument))
TP> seemed "almost good enough".
Agreed. But either way, I still there there is utility in a dict comprehension.
TP> BTW2, are we going to rename "dictionary" to "dict" before
TP> 2.2b2? Before 2.2, "dict" was universally used on c.l.py to
TP> mean dictionary, and I'm at least +0 on adopting that for
TP> official 2.2 use.
I wouldn't keep them both though. Use one or the other.
-Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [UPDATE] PEP 274, Dict Comprehensions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Dict API refinements (was PEP 274)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]