[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Tue, 02 Apr 2002 08:36:45 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Deprecating C APIs (Use of PyArg_NoArgs())
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[David Abrahams]
I missed what this function does,
x(seq) returns [(0, seq[0]), (1, seq[1]), ...]
but:
"indexer" is a noun. I like it provided the function returns an indexer(). Otherwise, I'm not too sure.
Yeah, that's my main problem with it.
"enumerate()" sounds like it returns a list of the elements, or is an iterator interface over the elements. Looking it up at http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary shows that it is dangerously close to meaning what we want to say. I say "dangerously" because it doesn't mean what we want to say, and I think a close-but-not-quite meaning is probably much worse than calling it wafflebird.
I don't know.
unfortunately, numerate and itemize both mean about the same...
Numerate is obscure, but itemize() has potential!
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Deprecating C APIs (Use of PyArg_NoArgs())
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]