[Python-Dev] ACCEPTED: PEP 285 (original) (raw)
Neal Norwitz neal@metaslash.com
Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:13:29 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] ACCEPTED: PEP 285
- Next message: [Python-Dev] ACCEPTED: PEP 285
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Despite the negative feedback, I've decided to accept the PEP. The most important perceived problem is that newbies tend to write if x == True: ... where they should write if x: ... I believe this problem should be solved by education (the Zen master hits the student on the head with a stick, and the student gets enlightenment) rather than by holding back what I believe will be a useful feature. You can expect the bool type in Python 2.3; it will be in CVS tonight.
And the warnings have already been added to pychecker. I know I'm going to wish I never said this, but ... If you find REAL problems with code that breaks, let me know. I will try to address problems that may arise.
This code: True = 1 False = 0
def test(a):
if a is True: print 'True'
if a == False: print 'False'
generates these warnings: test.py:2: Should not assign to True, it is (or will be) a builtin test.py:3: Should not assign to False, it is (or will be) a builtin test.py:6: Comparisions with True are not necessary test.py:7: Comparisions with False are not necessary
Neal
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] ACCEPTED: PEP 285
- Next message: [Python-Dev] ACCEPTED: PEP 285
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]