[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type (original) (raw)
Andrew Koenig ark@research.att.com
03 Apr 2002 23:08:12 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David> FWIW, that's the way it is in C++, and almost all of the same David> conclusions fall out of it. Also, as distasteful as it may seem David> intellectually, I have yet to hear any complaints about this David> situation in practice... so it seems to work out OK.
It seems only fair that I should mention a complaint: The fact that
bool is an integral type makes it necessary to have operator const void*
rather than operator bool as members of istream and ostream for
end-of-file testing. Otherwise, writing cin << x'' instead of
cin >> x'' by mistake would result in converting cin to bool
and thence to int, shifting the result right by x bits, and throwing
it away.
-- Andrew Koenig, ark@research.att.com, http://www.research.att.com/info/ark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]