[Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 13:38:57 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[me]
> All the Python developers need to do is decide on a point where they > won't allow incompatible changes to new features between micro > releases. Currently that point is the release of the "final" release > of a minor version (e.g. 2.2). I can see that point shifting to a > later micro release for future minor releases, so that e.g. 2.3, 2.3.1 > up to 2.3.7 may contain incompatible features, but 2.3.8 and later > must be compatible with 2.3.7.
[Alex]
It seems to me that the "stabilization" point SHOULD be more clearly marked -- get the message out "this IS stable and reliable, anything written for this release will not break in future releases of the same major.minor" in a very clear way.
Yes.
It seems to me that duplicating (in your example) 2.3.8 to 2.4.0 (and using 2.5.0 as the new baseline for further experimentation) would be a very clear signal in this sense.
If the community likes the even/odd distinction enough. I've heard mixed feelings.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]