[Python-Dev] Re: Unittest list (original) (raw)
Neal Norwitz neal@metaslash.com
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:09:01 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Unittest list
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Unittest list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > That "200", is the aprox number of functions that don't have > > a corresponding unittest? > > It's the # of C functions that were never called after running > the entire regression test suite. And what percentage is this of the total number of functions there?
In Objects/*.c, I estimate there are 1153 functions by:
egrep -A 3 '^(static|_Py|Py)' *.c | egrep '\.c-\{' | wc
There are about 161 in my list of untested functions.
I created this report around Dec 14, but I don't think this #
has changed too much. Although there may be about 10 more functions
which were tested, since I remember Fred adding some tests. I don't
know if the new tests were reflected.
So that's about 14% of functions in Objects/*.c are not called throughout all the regression tests.
I will try to run some updated reports to get more accurate info.
Some of the modules which had a larger # of untested functions include:
Objects/abstract.c
Objects/descrobject.c
Objects/typeobject.c
Objects/unicodeobject.c
Objects/weakrefobject.c
Neal
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Unittest list
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Unittest list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]