[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited (original) (raw)
Scott Gilbert xscottg@yahoo.com
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--- Alex Martelli <aleax@aleax.it> wrote:
... > There doesn't seem to be any single English word that > captures all of what we mean without ambiguity.
Not a single VERB -- adjective "numbered" might do. Unfortunately [...]
If there is no really good name, how about just adopting a new simple, short, word like "each", and letting it become the idiom?
for i, v in each(L):
print i, v
It worked for "zip" right?
Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]