[Python-Dev] re: PEP 279 revisited (original) (raw)
Paul Prescod paul@prescod.net
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:38:53 -0700
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] re: PEP 279 revisited, formally
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
... I'm +/- 0 on this. It saves a letter and may indeed suggest numbering more closely, but it's an even more obscure word than enumerate().
Is not obscurity a sort of virtue? If it hasn't been used in the languages space then it has no mental baggage. Compare with "Big endian", as obscure a reference as you'll find in computer science, I think. Or "thunk": a made-up word.
Paul Prescod
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] re: PEP 279 revisited, formally
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]