[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited (original) (raw)
Alex Martelli aleax@aleax.it
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:23:17 +0200
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 18:13, David Abrahams wrote: ...
> > should be named numer(), just like iter() is short for iterator. If ... Blick. Abbrevs suck. Plus I don't want to re-use the sucky name enum for something related to what 'C' and C++ use it for.
This proposal was for 'numer', not 'enum'. And, given a language that has a 'def' keyword, and built-ins called 'dict', 'iter', 'vars', 'bool', 'str', 'repr', etc (:-), the affermation "abbrevs suck" looks pretty peculiar to me. Note that a few of these are pretty new, too, so it's not a question of "legacy" -- clearly the designer prefers to use abbreviations in certain places he deems suitable.
Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]