[Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus? (original) (raw)
Paul Prescod paul@prescod.net
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:39:21 -0800
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[meant to send this before]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
... All right, but there also needs to be a way to invoke interpolation explicitly -- just like eval(). This has applicability e.g. in i18n.
Agree 100%. The last time we discussed this I proposed there should be a function to do this. But the naive integrated syntax could be compile time.
My complaints with the current interpolation are:
- they require too many magical incantations to invoke (especially % vars())
- they require too much thinking about types and conversions in the syntax
- special behaviour with dictionaries and tuples and singleton tuples etc.
- operator abuse
I would only be in favour of a replacement if for simple cases it cleared up all of these issues so that it is roughly as easy as in Perl/Ruby/sh/tcl:
a = "Mynameis"My name is "Mynameisname"
If there is any more syntax than that then personally I think that the cost/benefit ratio falls down. So I don't see this as a big win:
a = "My name is $name" \ locals()
It solves two of my four problems.
Maybe other people have different goals than I do and that's why they see the above as a "win".
Paul Prescod
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]