[Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type (original) (raw)
Samuele Pedroni pedroni@inf.ethz.ch
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:06:03 +0100
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Ka-Ping Yee <ping@lfw.org>
Will people waste time on silly arguments about "thou shalt change thy code to the One True/False Style, because it is the Proper Way" vs. "but 0/1 works and it's less typing and i don't want to bother"? Will programmers expend a bunch of effort editing their code to work the new way -- effort that could have been better spent fixing and improving their programs? (Instantiate the preceding question with programmers := Python-developers and programs := Python standard library.)
Although it was not said so explicitly, my design exercise related to Jython shows that probably a lot of Jython user code will still preserve many:
jbean.beanProp = 1
where 1 would be better written as True.
regards.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message: [Python-Dev] For review: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]