[Python-Dev] PEP 263 considered faulty (for some Japanese) (original) (raw)
Tom Emerson tree@basistech.com
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:43:06 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 263 considered faulty (for some Japanese)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 263 considered faulty (for some Japanese)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
SUZUKI> Just one worry: [UTF-8 BOM] may be incompatible with SUZUKI> '#!/usr/bin/env' used in Unix.
It probably is, but it's out of Python's control: the editor will add it. And this can (and will) be handled by changing the shells.
The UTF-8 BOM is an aBOMination that should not be allowed to live. The only editor that I know of that inserts the sequence is Microsoft's WordPad (or TextPad, I don't use either). I hope XEmacs isn't going to do this.
The point of the UniBOM is to determine the byte-order used in a UTF-(16|32) or UCS-[24] encoded file: one can of course us it as an indicator for Unicode, but it should not be used as an encoding idenfier. It is merely a hint.
-tree
-- Tom Emerson Basis Technology Corp. Sr. Computational Linguist http://www.basistech.com "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever"
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 263 considered faulty (for some Japanese)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 263 considered faulty (for some Japanese)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]