[Python-Dev] SF tracker problems (original) (raw)

Michael Hudson mwh@python.net
13 Mar 2002 15:22:11 +0000

aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:

Figured this should be moved.

Probably right. Slightly surprisingly, there doesn't seem to be a sf support request on this issue -- maybe it's just us?

I'll file one... here:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=529477&group_id=1&atid=200001

Cheers, M.

------- start of forwarded message ------- Newsgroups: comp.lang.python From: Michael Hudson <mwh@python.net> Subject: Re: zlib vulnerabilities and python Message-ID: <u8z8wsey5.fsf@python.net> References: <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> <a6nnsg$chc$1@panix1.panix.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:43:13 GMT

aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes: > In article <SASl3IAyAUj8EwS4@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>, > Robin Becker <robin@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: >> >>Does the recent zlib double free vulnerability >>http://news.com.com/2100-1001-857008.html >>impact zlib.pyd? > > Dunno, but I filed a SF bug to check compatibility with the new 1.1.4. But because mail from the sf tracker seems to be hitting the bit bucket, noone knows about this. Time to look at roundup again? The tracker on sf is starting to piss me off (even more). Cheers, M. -- We've had a lot of problems going from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1. People claim binary compatibility. Except for functions they don't like. -- Peter Van Eynde, comp.lang.lisp ------- end of forwarded message -------

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev

-- 42. You can measure a programmer's perspective by noting his attitude on the continuing vitality of FORTRAN. -- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html