[Python-Dev] Breaking bug #411881 into manageable pieces (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.one@comcast.net
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:30:33 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Breaking bug #411881 into manageable pieces
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Breaking bug #411881 into manageable pieces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Skip Montanaro]
... Attached are the notes I took while picking through the source.
If everyone would do the sensible thing and upgrade to Outlook, they'd have no trouble reading your notes .
doctest.py: I Trust Tim (tm)
Me too. The first bare except is exec'ing arbitrary user-supplied
code, and needs to catch everything. The second needs to ignore
any exception that may be raised by a user-define __str__, and
that's any exception whatsoever, so ditto.
threading.py: I Trust Tim.
The first needs to catch any exception that may leak out of the
user's thread code, so can't be limited. The second is lazy:
try:
self.__delete()
except:
pass
but can't be made stronger without guessing at all the exceptions
self.__delete() may raise. You should shame Guido into catching
the exceptions he thinks are "normal" in the body of self.__delete,
and stop catching any at its call site. The answers aren't obvious
to me, but I'm afraid this is one of those contexts where we can
get into non-obvious trouble due to module globals getting None'd
out when Python is shutting down. Better a Big Hammer than bogus
shutdown errors.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Breaking bug #411881 into manageable pieces
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Breaking bug #411881 into manageable pieces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]