[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:39:10 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Executive Summary: 1. iterindexed(collection) --> accepted
Except I want to think more about the name.
2. gen comprehensions --> rejected
Good.
3. gen exception passing --> deferred, needs case building
OK (or you could give up now while you're ahead :-).
4. gen parameter passing --> deferred, needs alternatives explored
That one was already taken out of the PEP. I think that #3 probably fits better in the new PEP you were gonna write for #4. But to be honest, I don't encourage you to write it -- I expect I'm gonna reject both in the end. But I can't stop you. :-)
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]