[Python-Dev] ConfigParser with a single section (original) (raw)

Gustavo Niemeyer niemeyer@conectiva.com
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:45:40 -0200

Patch #549037 implements an interesting feature: it allows one to have configuration files without headers. I'd like to know what's your opinion about this issue, so that we can either forget the issue or implement the functionality, closing that bug.

A few comments about the issue:

I would use a different implementation than the one provided in the patch. The patch includes a new parameter in read functions, stating what's the first section name. It means that we could have other sections after the first unheaded section. IMO, that situation should still be considered an error.

One possible way to implement it is to include a "noheaders" boolean parameter for the constructor. Then, the user would have to know what's the standard single section name, to pass it to functions like get().

Another way would be to include something like a "singlesection" parameter in the constructor. This parameter would accept a string option, which would name the single section.

As an argument against the whole issue, I'm not sure how unconfortable it is to simply include a header in the file to satisfy the parser.

As an argument favorable, this could allow ConfigParser to parse simple (no escapes or variables) shell configuration files and other simple configurations using NAME=VALUE style.

What's your suggestion?

-- Gustavo Niemeyer

[ 2AAC 7928 0FBF 0299 5EB5 60E2 2253 B29A 6664 3A0C ]