[Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True) (original) (raw)
Fredrik Lundh fredrik@pythonware.com
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:22:13 +0100
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Just van Rossum wrote:
I agree. Also: whatever the value is, it can't be any more meaningful than any other, as I don't think the value has any meaning in this context ;-)
if the value has no meaning, why not use a set? how many ways do we need to do the same thing?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]