[Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues (original) (raw)
Brian Quinlan brian@sweetapp.com
Mon, 07 Oct 2002 17:32:39 -0700
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Ewing wrote:
I have to agree that would be a better use for them.
So, I'm now reduced to suggesting <2/3>
Is that going to be easy to parse?
1 <5/2> -3 1
Cheers, Brian
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]