[Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3 (original) (raw)
Martin v. Loewis martin@v.loewis.de
30 Oct 2002 06:51:41 +0100
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
Perhaps it could be made into an alternative for bsddb to make that simpler (someone could even contribute code to let setup.py decide).
Sure.
What's the license on the bsddb3 Python extension?
See below.
What's the license on the BerkeleyDB code from Sleepycat?
There are two licenses: One that they call the "open source license", see
http://www.sleepycat.com/license.net
There is also a commercial license.
Can we legally distribute RPMs or other binaries containing it? (I thought there were some restrictions that make it not open source.)
It depends. This is the condition:
Redistributions in any form must be accompanied by information on
how to obtain complete source code for the DB software and any
accompanying software that uses the DB software. The source code
must either be included in the distribution or be available for no
more than the cost of distribution plus a nominal fee, and must be
freely redistributable under reasonable conditions.
So distributing Python itself should be no problem.
It appears that the Pythonlabs distribution still uses DB 1.85. Don't tell that Skip :-) He believes that this version has serious flaws that can lead to data corruption...
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]