[Python-Dev] Re: httplib.py vs 222 (original) (raw)
Jeremy Hylton jeremy@alum.mit.edu
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:44:10 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] httplib.py vs 222
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: httplib.py vs 222
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"MH" == Michael Hudson <mwh@python.net> writes:
MH> I'm tempted to just dump the trunk's version of httplib.py onto MH> the release branch. Poring over logs reveals that nearly every MH> checkin is marked as a bugfix candidate (occasionally with a MH> question mark).
MH> Certainly it seems ot would be easier to work the checkins that MH> aren't bugfixes out of the trunk than work those that are into MH> the branch, if you see what I mean.
MH> But I've never used httplib, so I thought I should ask here MH> first (and Cc: the people responsible for most of the changes).
MH> Comments?
I think it makes sense to make httplib identical. The changes to httplib have all been intended to make it more robust.
My one worry is that a set of changes I made may have broken pipelined https requests in order to fix a different set of bugs. I had intended to check whether pipelined https requests actually worked in 2.2.1.
Jeremy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] httplib.py vs 222
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: httplib.py vs 222
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]