[Python-Dev] Final PEP 311 run (original) (raw)

Mark Hammond mhammond@skippinet.com.au
Sat, 19 Apr 2003 12:34:37 +1000

[Tim]

Some questions occurred while reading the PEP again, primarily are there any

To save space, the answer to all your questions are "it is ok", and "it must avoid using the same handle - it must use its own". I have updated the PEP and the patch (primarily in the comments for the new functions) to hopefully clarify this.

> The only issue is the name of the API.

If that's the only issue, check it in yesterday <0.9 wink>.

OK, I'm gunna hold that against you

Guido:

How about PyGILStateEnsure() and PyGILStateRestore()?

Done! I have checked in a new pep-311, and a new patch (http://www.python.org/sf/684256). So if Guido can formally pronounce on pep-311, I will use those words against Tim and check it in!

Thanks,

Mark.