[Python-Dev] Extended Function syntax (PEP time) (original) (raw)
Moore, Paul Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:44:49 -0000
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Acquire/release functionality (Was: Extended Functionsyntax)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: M.-A. Lemburg [mailto:mal@lemburg.com]
Given the length of this thread, could someone please distill this into one or more PEPs ?!
I'm willing to make a stab at a PEP on the "with" syntax. I can't offer any implementation effort, sorry. I'll hash something up over the next few days.
I'd suggest someone write a PEP on the def ... [expr] syntax, too. I don't want to end up juggling 2 PEPs, so I'd rather someone else did this.
I can't see enough clarity in the various versions of the thunk proposals to make a decent PEP yet. But I'd love someone to prove me wrong :-) [AFAICT, the thunk discussions are still in flux in both syntax and semantics, to there's little definite to write down].
I don't think there are any other concrete offerings on the table.
Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Acquire/release functionality (Was: Extended Functionsyntax)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]