[Python-Dev] Re: Trinary Operators (original) (raw)
Shane Holloway (IEEE) shane.holloway@ieee.org
Thu, 06 Feb 2003 18:09:07 -0700
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Trinary Operators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Trinary Operators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gerald S. Williams wrote:
Compare this to the order of evaluation in the current equivalent (parentheses for clarity only): (x and y) and 1 or 0
or if you prefer: ((x and y) and [1] or [0])[0]
I was thinking that the semantics of "and" & "or" are the replacement for the trinary operator? Since these operations always return the last evaluated subexpression (the same subexpression that short-circuits the evaluation), they can be used as Gerald outlines above. It seems very consistent, logical, and understandable to me; but then again, I love the semantics of list compressions. ;)
Thanks, -Shane Holloway
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Trinary Operators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Trinary Operators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]