[Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize? (original) (raw)
Roman Suzi rnd@onego.ru
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:42:27 +0300 (MSK)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Codecs data
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Greg Ewing wrote:
Lalo Martins <lalo@laranja.org>:
I just realized I'm finally tired of typing "Explicit is better than implicit". Can we agree to call this maxim EIBTI? Or we could follow the Ferengi and just assign numbers to the Rules of Pythonicness.
Oh... I am preparing a PEP with the word "Implicit" in the title. Is it doomed to be rejected out-right?
I do not like abbreviation EIBTI. It contradicts SIBTC, SIBTD and RC ;-)
Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
rnd@onego.ru == My AI powered by Linux RedHat 7.3
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Codecs data
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]