[Python-Dev] Re: new bytecode results (original) (raw)
Damien Morton newsgroups1@bitfurnace.com
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:14:22 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] new bytecode results
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: new bytecode results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Dan Sugalski" <dan@sidhe.org>
At 1:54 PM -0500 2/27/03, Damien Morton wrote: >In general, it would seem that adding opcodes in bulk, even if many opcodes >switch to the same labels, results in a minor performance loss.
While I'm somewhat loathe to help you guys go faster (that whole pie thing) you might want to take a look at commonly used pairs of opcodes and reordering the code in the switch body so pairs are adjacent and more likely to be in cache.
I caught the whole pie conversation, but I missed how you were going to test Parrot against Python.
How exactly will this competion be measured?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] new bytecode results
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: new bytecode results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]