[Python-Dev] funny leak (original) (raw)
Neal Norwitz neal@metaslash.com
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:00:23 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Next message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 07:51:00AM -0600, Jeff Epler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:43:16AM -0500, Neal Norwitz wrote: > One ref may be leaked the first time gc.collect() is called with > garbage (23150 -> 23151). But after that, no more refs are leaked > (ref count stays at 23151).
If that's true, then running the 'def' block repeatedly will leak references, right? I think from Christian's original message this is what he meant, but I'm not sure.
I misread the original message. Running the 'def' block does indeed leak a reference and collect() has no effect. Similarly:
[23154 refs]
>>> def conjoin(gs):
... def gen():
... gs # unbreakable cycle
... gen # unless one is commented out
...
[23194 refs]
>>> del conjoin
[23155 refs]
Neal
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Next message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]