[Python-Dev] funny leak (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.one@comcast.net
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:57:04 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Next message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Christian Tismer]
No, this is not the point. Don't call the function at all, just execute the above code and call gc.collect(). You will see one reference eaten every time you repeat this.
Can you show explicit evidence instead of trying to describe it? Here's what I tried:
def one(): def conjoin(gs): def gen(): gs # unbreakable cycle gen # unless one is commented out
import sys, gc lastrc = 0 while 1: one() gc.collect() thisrc = sys.gettotalrefcount() print thisrc - lastrc, lastrc = thisrc
Running that program under a debug-build CVS Python shows no growth in sys.gettotalrefcount() after the first two iterations. It also displays no process-size growth. IOW, I see no evidence of any flavor of leak.
I don't claim that you don't, but I don't know what "just execute the above code ... one reference eaten every time" means. It can't mean executing the specific program I pasted in above, because that simply doesn't eat a reference each time.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Next message: [Python-Dev] funny leak
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]