[Python-Dev] Re: Dictionary tuning (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy@udel.edu
Thu, 1 May 2003 11:27:34 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Dictionary tuning
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Dictionary tuning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From my curious user viewpoint ...
"Michael Hudson" <mwh@python.net> wrote in message news:2m65ouahg6.fsf@starship.python.net...
Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> [Tim] >> > The benchmarking suite should also be checked in, and should be >> > very welcome. Perhaps it's time for a "benchmark" subdirectory >> > under Lib/test? It doesn't make much sense even now that pystone >> > and sortperf live directly in the test directory.
- 1 on a separate subdirectory (there are two other already) to make these easier to find (or ignore).
>> Works for me. Can we perhaps decide whether we want to do this in the >> near future? I am going to be writing up module docs for the test package >> and if we are going to end up moving them I would like to be get this >> written into the docs the first time through.
- 1 on doing so by 2.3 final if not before
> Should the benchmarks directory be part of the distribution, or should > it be in the nondist part of the CVS tree?
I can't think why you'd want it in nondist, unless they depend on huge input files or something.
- 1 on keeping these with the standard distribution. Sortperf.py is a great example of random + systematic corner case testing extended to something more complicated than binary ops. Besides that, I expect to actually use it, with minor mods, sometime later this year. I am more than happy to give it the 4K bytes it uses.
Terry J. Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Dictionary tuning
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Dictionary tuning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]