[Python-Dev] python/dist/src/Lib/bsddb init.py,1.5,1.6 (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Fri Sep 12 19:50:40 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] python/dist/src/Lib/bsddb __init__.py,1.5,1.6
- Next message: [Python-Dev] python/dist/src/Lib/bsddb __init__.py,1.5,1.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Raymond]
> > > I would like to backport this patch to Py2.3.1. > > > The effort to provide a full mapping interface to all > > > mapping like objects was attempted in Py2.3 and several > > > modules for the bsddb package were updated, but this > > > one was missed and the package was left half converted. > > > > > > IIRC, dbhash and bsddb don't affect the Apple MacIntosh > > > users. Also, since this effort was started for bsddb and > > > only half completed, I view it to be a bit of a bugfix as > > > well as being featurelike. It certainly affects the usability > > > of the module (the looping example and related text in > > > the docs were both wrong -- that would not have happened > > > if the normal looping expectations were supported). [GvR] > > Can you discuss this on python-dev? [Raymond] > Guys, are you okay with backporting this? [Jeremy] Isn't this just the sort of little feature that was the subject of recent discussion on the dangers of backporting. It would mean that someone writing an app against Python 2.3 could never be sure whether the feature existed. In practice, that would mean developers using 2.3.x would only find out about problems after deployment when they bump into a user with the original 2.3.
I'm not sure how convincing I find this argument, but it's got some merit.
It has some. That's why GvR had me bring it to python-dev so you guys could help decide on the proper balance. But for that one thought, the decision to apply is clear cut.
Thoughts in favor of applying:
- the existing interface is a pain and is misdocumented in Py2.3.0
- the patch was already half complete for 2.3.0 (applied to dbobj and dbshelve) init.py was just missed).
- the patch was already applied to dumbdbm and shelve for Py2.3.0
- if needed, it's not hard to write code that automatically adjusts for Py2.3.0: if not f.class.bases: f.class.__bases = (UserDict.DictMixin,)
- waiting another 18 months to put this in just results in that many more installed Pythons out there without the patch
Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] python/dist/src/Lib/bsddb __init__.py,1.5,1.6
- Next message: [Python-Dev] python/dist/src/Lib/bsddb __init__.py,1.5,1.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]