[Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing (original) (raw)

Aahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Thu Sep 25 19:46:31 EDT 2003

On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

Michael Bartl <zeddicus at satokar.com> writes:

I just wanted to ask if there is interest in a PEP about that topic, because I couldn't find any relevant information on python.org. A PEP would not be appropriate: it would indicate the need for BDFL pronouncement on the procedures presented, or consensus within some group, when I think neither consensus nor BDFL pronouncement is necessary. Instead, a plain web page on python.org would be sufficient.

Hmmmm.... While I'd agree with you in the absence of anything else, it seems to me that the existence of PEP 3 indicates that this subject is PEP-worthy. Unless you want to argue that PEP 3 should be removed?...

Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --Bill Harlan

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list