[Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing (original) (raw)
Brett C. bac at OCF.Berkeley.EDU
Thu Sep 25 23:23:20 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
Martin v. Löwis writes: > A PEP would not be appropriate: it would indicate the need for BDFL > pronouncement on the procedures presented, or consensus within some > group, when I think neither consensus nor BDFL pronouncement is > necessary. Instead, a plain web page on python.org would be > sufficient.
If some4one writes up a reST document describing this, it would be easy enough to add it to the dev/ area.
Just so people don't go too far with this, I am going to be typing up something about the Python development process. It is going to be my entry for a talk at PyCon this year.
So something that encompasses all of this will get written up by December. If it isn't a total piece of literary trash I will add it to /dev on the site.
-Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]